全球交易商監管查詢APP
什麼是WikiFX
WikiFX
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
WikiFX
暫無監管

RR

5-10年
監管牌照存疑 展業區域存疑 高級風險隱患

天眼評分

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
/10

監管指數 0.00

業務指數 7.40

風控指數 0.00

監管資訊

暫未查證到有效監管資訊,請注意風險!

提示:天眼評分過低,請遠離!

上次檢測 2025-12-16
風險 2

基礎資訊

註冊地區
印度 印度
經營年限
5-10年
公司全稱
RR Financial Consultants Ltd
客服郵箱
pamdrr@rrfcl.com
聯繫電話
+911144441111
展業區域
官網鑒定
Wiki問答
評價

瀏覽RR 的用戶還瀏覽了..

STARTRADER

STARTRADER

8.57
天眼評分
ECN賬戶 10-15年澳大利亞監管全牌照(MM)主標MT4
STARTRADER
STARTRADER
天眼評分
8.57
ECN賬戶 10-15年澳大利亞監管全牌照(MM)主標MT4
跳轉官網
MiTRADE

MiTRADE

8.60
天眼評分
10-15年澳大利亞監管全牌照(MM)自研
MiTRADE
MiTRADE
天眼評分
8.60
10-15年澳大利亞監管全牌照(MM)自研
跳轉官網
FBS

FBS

8.80
天眼評分
ECN賬戶 5-10年澳大利亞監管全牌照(MM)主標MT4
FBS
FBS
天眼評分
8.80
ECN賬戶 5-10年澳大利亞監管全牌照(MM)主標MT4
跳轉官網
AVATRADE

AVATRADE

9.50
天眼評分
ECN賬戶 15-20年澳大利亞監管全牌照(MM)主標MT4
AVATRADE
AVATRADE
天眼評分
9.50
ECN賬戶 15-20年澳大利亞監管全牌照(MM)主標MT4
跳轉官網

官網鑒定

  • rrfinance.com
    伺服器IP
    103.35.123.211
    伺服器所在地
    印度 印度
    備案號
    --
    主要訪問國家/地區
    --
    功能變數名稱創建時間
    1999-12-14
    網站名稱
    WHOIS.REGISTER.COM
    所屬公司
    REGISTER.COM, INC.

Wiki問答

MarceloD
MarceloD
1-2年

What are the main drawbacks or potential risks associated with using RR that I should keep in mind?

WikiFX
WikiFX 回答

In my personal experience evaluating brokers, I put a premium on transparency, regulation, and overall risk management. With RR, several red flags stand out for me and would warrant serious caution. First and foremost, RR currently operates with no valid regulatory oversight, which for me is a non-negotiable risk factor. Reliable regulation sets a standard for client protection and dispute resolution; lacking this, I have no assurance that funds are properly safeguarded or that fair trading conditions are enforced. Additionally, RR is marked as carrying a high potential risk, and its regulatory license and scope of business are both labeled “suspicious.” I always question how a broker justifies such descriptors while maintaining credibility. Their risk management index is sitting at zero, which for me raises concerns about internal controls and operational integrity—I want visible systems that can withstand volatility or technical difficulties. Despite RR’s operational history of five to ten years and being registered in India, neither longevity nor location compensates for the absence of trusted regulatory backing. For me, all these shortcomings add up to a situation where capital may be exposed to unnecessary risk, and reliable recourse in the event of disputes could be absent. Therefore, I would personally keep my distance and carefully weigh these vulnerabilities before considering RR for any trading activity.

Broker Issues
RR
RR
Regulation
09-02
美國
QM Trader
QM Trader
1-2年

Which trading platforms are offered by RR, and do they include MT4, MT5, or cTrader?

WikiFX
WikiFX 回答

As an experienced forex trader, I've always made it a point to evaluate brokers critically, particularly when it comes to trading platform availability and transparency. Based on my review of RR, I was unable to confirm that they offer industry-standard platforms like MT4, MT5, or cTrader. This is particularly concerning for me, as these platforms are heavily relied upon by traders worldwide for their reliability, functionality, and robust security features. When a broker does not provide clear information about their trading platforms, it raises red flags about both accessibility and overall trustworthiness. I also look for clarity on platform features and software licensing, since that directly impacts order execution and risk management for my trades. In RR’s case, the absence of any mention of MT4, MT5, or cTrader was notable, and for me, this is a significant limitation. Without transparent details, I can't be confident that RR supports the trading tools and infrastructure needed for serious trading. Given these gaps, I have to approach RR with caution, especially since platform transparency is a key factor in my broker selection process. For my own trading, I wouldn’t proceed without verifiable information and a proven track record with established platforms.

Broker Issues
RR
RR
Leverage
Instruments
Account
Platform
08-27
美國
Ibgentle
Ibgentle
1-2年

What are the primary benefits and drawbacks of trading with RR?

WikiFX
WikiFX 回答

Having traded with a range of brokers over the years, I approach any new platform with a focus on regulation and risk management. With RR, I immediately noticed several key concerns. The most substantial drawback for me is the complete lack of valid regulatory oversight. Seeing explicit warnings about suspicious regulatory licenses and the recommendation to stay away is something I can’t ignore, especially as capital safety and dispute resolution are top priorities in my trading practices. A broker with no recognized regulation simply can't guarantee client fund protection or transparency, which adds considerable risk. On the plus side, RR has been operating for five to ten years, and their business index is relatively strong, which indicates they have some operational experience in the market. Their local presence in India seems tailored for traders from that region and they offer accessible customer support via multiple channels. However, in my experience, operational history and accessible support can't compensate for the absence of strong regulatory backing, especially given the zero score in the risk management index. For me, the potential risks far outweigh any operational benefits. When a broker lacks regulation, I worry about the security of my funds and the fairness of trade execution. Alternatives with solid regulatory frameworks and higher trust scores provide me with greater peace of mind, which I consider fundamentally important before committing any real capital.

Broker Issues
RR
RR
Regulation
08-25
美國
Bhavani Durga K
Bhavani Durga K
1-2年

What's the lowest amount I’m allowed to take out from my RR account in a single withdrawal?

WikiFX
WikiFX 回答

After reviewing the available details on RR, I could not locate any transparent or official information regarding minimum withdrawal amounts from their platform. In my experience as a trader, this lack of clarity around basic account functions is immediately concerning—especially with a broker that WikiFX flags for “Suspicious Regulatory License” and “High potential risk,” and with a regulatory score of zero out of ten. For those of us safeguarding our funds, clear withdrawal policies are fundamental to trust and operational safety. The absence of this data leaves too much room for unpleasant surprises, like hidden fees, restrictions, or arbitrary delays that can make accessing your own money difficult or stressful. Because RR currently shows no valid regulatory oversight, I would be extremely cautious about depositing or attempting to withdraw funds. Regulatory licensing exists to ensure brokers keep clients’ money safe and handle withdrawal requests transparently. With RR, this safety net simply isn’t present. For me, unless the broker can provide up-to-date, written withdrawal conditions—and ideally, show evidence of proper oversight—I would refrain from using their services altogether. When it comes to financial security and your ability to access your money, uncertainty is never worth the risk.

Broker Issues
RR
RR
Withdrawal
Deposit
07-30
美國
查看更多
發布評價
爆料
爆料
中評
中評
好評
好評

你要評價的內容

請輸入...

提交
爆料 Customer Service 聯繫我們 Download App APP Scroll to Top TOP

Chrome

Chrome插件

全球交易商監管查詢

瀏覽外匯經紀商網站
精準識別經紀商真假優劣

現在安裝

香港
台灣
美國
韓國
英國
日本
印尼
越南
澳大利亞
新加坡
泰國
賽普勒斯
德國
俄羅斯
菲律賓
新西蘭
烏克蘭
印度
法國
西班牙
葡萄牙
馬來西亞
尼日利亞
柬埔寨
意大利
南非
土耳其
荷蘭
阿聯酋
哥倫比亞
阿根廷
白俄羅斯
厄瓜多爾
埃及
哈薩克斯坦
摩洛哥
墨西哥
秘魯
巴基斯坦
突尼斯
委內瑞拉
美国
您正在訪問的是WikiFX網站。 WikiFX互聯網及其移動端產品是一款面向全球用戶的企業信息查詢工具。用戶在使用WikiFX產品時,請自覺遵守所在國家、地區有關的法律規範。
客服電話:006531388986
Facebook:外匯天眼(台灣)
Line 訂閱號:@wikifxtw
牌照等資訊糾錯請發送資訊至:qa@wikifx.com
商務合作:business@wikifx.com
全球交易商監管查詢APP 下載