Abstract:Interactive Brokers (also known as 盈透证券) is a prominent brokerage with significant global influence, holding an AAA Influence Rank and a WikiFX score of 8.29. Established in 2002 and headquartered in Hong Kong, the broker serves clients across major markets including Australia, the US, China, and the UK.

Interactive Brokers (also known as 盈透证券) is a prominent brokerage with significant global influence, holding an AAA Influence Rank and a WikiFX score of 8.29. Established in 2002 and headquartered in Hong Kong, the broker serves clients across major markets including Australia, the US, China, and the UK.
While the broker boasts top-tier licenses and a strong market position, its regulatory record is mixed, featuring both active licenses and significant fines from major financial authorities. This review analyzes its regulatory framework, user complaints, and trading environment to determine its safety.
Is Interactive Brokers Legit? Regulatory Status & Safety
Interactive Brokers holds licenses from several top-tier financial regulators, positioning it as a heavily supervised entity. However, the status of these licenses varies, with some flagged abnormalities.
Regulatory License Table
Key Regulatory Notes:
- Tier-1 Safety: The broker is actively regulated by the FCA (UK), ASIC (Australia), and CIRO (Canada), which are considered high-standard regulatory bodies.
- Red Flags: Use caution regarding the specific entities. One ASIC license is listed as Revoked, and the NFA (USA) license status is marked as “Exceeded”, suggesting the entity may be operating beyond its permitted business scope in that jurisdiction.
Regulatory Disclosures and Fines
Data indicates that Interactive Brokers has faced penalties from multiple regulators, which traders should consider:
- ASIC (Australia): In September 2023, the broker paid a penalty of $832,500 for “negligent” and “reckless” conduct regarding market integrity and failing to identify suspicious client transactions.
- NFA (USA): In April 2022, the broker was ordered to pay a $250,000 fine for cancelling retail forex orders without valid reasons and failing to supervise employees adequately.
- FCA (UK): The broker previously faced a fine of over £1 million for poor market abuse controls and failure to report suspicious client trading.
- BAPPEBTI (Indonesia): The broker was listed among blocked entities for operating without specific local authorization.
Interactive Brokers Complaints and Scam Exposure
Despite its high score and regulation, WikiFX has received 12 complaints in the last 3 months. The casesText highlights specific issues reported by users in Hong Kong and Vietnam.
Withdrawal and Account Issues
- Account Freezing (Hong Kong): A user reported that after submitting requested compliance documents, their account was frozen and closed. The user alleged that remaining funds (over $20,000 USD) were withheld, and customer service ceased responding to calls and emails.
- Blocked Withdrawals (Vietnam): Multiple reports from Vietnam allege that the broker prevented withdrawals and locked accounts.
- “VIP Upgrade” Demands: One case described a scenario where a user was unable to withdraw funds unless they “upgraded to VIP” for 3 months. Note: This specific tactic is often associated with clone firms or fraudulent schemes using a big brand's name, but it was reported against this broker profile.
Warning: Traders should be vigilant about verifying they are dealing with the official website, as high-profile brands are often impersonated.
Trading Software and Platform
Interactive Brokers does not use the standard MetaTrader (MT4/5) ecosystem. Instead, it utilizes a Self-Developed (Proprietary) Platform.
- Platform Availability: The software supports Mobile trading (Android and iOS).
- Apps: Traders can use apps such as IBKR Mobile, IBKR GlobalTrader, and IMPACT.
- Features: The platform is described as highly customizable with clear fee reporting and search functions.
- Limitations: The provided data suggests the experience is rated as “Average,” and there is a lack of support mentioned for Windows/MacOS desktop applications or Web-based trading in some contexts, relying heavily on mobile solutions.
- Security: The review notes a lack of biometric authentication or two-step login features for enhanced security on some versions.
Customer Service
Interactive Brokers offers extensive global support, covering 31 languages and 15 regions.
- Channels: Support is available via Phone, Instant Messaging, and Social Media (Facebook, X, Instagram, LinkedIn, YouTube).
- Regional Numbers: Dedicated phone lines exist for Australia, the US, China, Switzerland, the UK, Japan, Singapore, and more.
- Responsiveness: While support is comprehensive, summary data indicates that wait times can be long.
Pros and Cons of Interactive Brokers
Final Verdict: Can You Trust Interactive Brokers?
Interactive Brokers is a legitimate industry giant with an 8.29 WikiFX Score and regulation from the world's strictest financial authorities (FCA, ASIC, FSA). However, safety is not absolute. The broker's record includes significant fines for compliance failures, and recent user complaints highlight issues with account freezes and withdrawals in certain regions.
Recommendation: While the broker is generally considered safe for institutional and professional traders due to its strong regulatory backing, retail traders should be aware of the proprietary platform's learning curve and the strict compliance checks that may affect account access.
Protect Your Capital: Before depositing with Interactive Brokers, verify the URL matches the official regulatory records to avoid clones. Use the WikiFX App to check the latest license status and read real-time user reviews.