WikiFX Deep Dive Review: ExpertOption
Reference to WikiFX records shows that **ExpertOption is a high-risk broker.** While the company has been operating since 2017 and has a popular trading app, the safety foundations are weak.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:A new wave of unlicensed investment platforms has been identified by Italian regulators. These sites often mimic real brokers, making it crucial for investors to confirm regulatory status through trusted sources like WikiFX.

Italys financial regulator CONSOB has moved to restrict access to five online platforms found to be operating without authorization. These websites, presenting themselves as legitimate financial service providers, were offering investment products to Italian users in violation of local regulations.
The following platforms have been flagged and are now subject to access restrictions within Italy:
According to CONSOB, these platforms have been offering financial or trading services to the Italian public without holding any regulatory license. Some display sophisticated web design and trading interfaces to appear credible, while lacking any formal oversight or compliance with EU investment laws.
The access restriction, enforced through Italys “Growth Decree,” empowers CONSOB to request internet providers to block unlicensed financial websites. Although implementation by ISPs may take several days, investors are strongly advised to avoid engaging with any of the listed domains.
This latest action adds to a growing list of over 1,300 platforms that have been blacked out by CONSOB since it was granted web-blocking authority. The increasing prevalence of such cases highlights the need for stronger awareness and verification before investing online.
Investors are reminded that appearance does not equal legitimacy. Many fraudulent websites mimic the branding of real financial institutions, promise unusually high returns, or pressure users into quick decisions.
To stay safe, always verify the regulatory status of a platform before depositing funds. Tools like WikiFX can help you identify whether a broker holds a valid license, what jurisdiction it falls under, and how it has been reviewed by other users. Avoid platforms not listed in official registries, and be especially wary of unsolicited offers received via social media, messaging apps, or email.
If you suspect a platform may be fraudulent, report it promptly to the relevant authorities—and consult reliable resources before taking any investment action.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Reference to WikiFX records shows that **ExpertOption is a high-risk broker.** While the company has been operating since 2017 and has a popular trading app, the safety foundations are weak.

If you are looking into ICM Capital (also known simply as ICM), you might be attracted by their established history since 2017 or their access to the MetaTrader platforms. However, glancing at the surface isn't enough when your capital is at risk. With a concerning WikiFX Score of 2.46 out of 10, this broker is currently flashing warning signals that every potential client needs to understand before hitting the "Deposit" button.

In the world of online trading, trust is the currency that matters most. However, recent data aggregation by WikiFX has signaled a "level red" alert regarding Tradeview Markets. Between July and November 2025, our support center was flooded with complaints alleging that the broker unilaterally wiped out account balances under the guise of "negative balance reversal," while simultaneously employing "account deletion" tactics in Asian markets. This report investigates the alarming patterns behind these complaints and analyzes why existing regulations failed to protect these traders.

For traders asking, "Is ZarVista legit?", the evidence points to a clear and strong conclusion: ZarVista operates as a high-risk broker. While it shows a modern interface and different account types, these features are overshadowed by major weaknesses in how it is regulated, a history of legal problems, and many user complaints. This article will break down these issues to give you a complete view of the risks involved. Our analysis shows that the chance of losing capital when dealing with ZarVista is very high. The combination of weak overseas licensing and documented problems creates a situation where trader funds are not properly protected.