WikiFX Deep Dive Review: ExpertOption
Reference to WikiFX records shows that **ExpertOption is a high-risk broker.** While the company has been operating since 2017 and has a popular trading app, the safety foundations are weak.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:In recent weeks, concerns have emerged regarding a potential fraudulent trading platform operating under the name SILEGX. A whistleblower email, received by WikiFX’s customer service team, has drawn attention to the broker, which is allegedly linked to the now-defunct UKXVE, a platform previously accused of fraudulent activities in Malaysia.

In recent weeks, concerns have emerged regarding a potential fraudulent trading platform operating under the name SILEGX. A whistleblower email, received by WikiFXs customer service team, has drawn attention to the broker, which is allegedly linked to the now-defunct UKXVE, a platform previously accused of fraudulent activities in Malaysia.
The anonymous whistleblower alleges that SILEGX, along with another platform named Twyae, is operating in a manner similar to UKXVE. According to the email, SILEGX has multiple active domains (silegx.org, silegxq.com, silegx.com), which is a tactic often used by questionable financial platforms to maintain operations even after regulatory scrutiny.
The whistleblower further claims that the marketing strategies, sponsored social media posts, and online presence of SILEGX resemble those of UKXVE before it ceased operations. This suggests a possible rebranding effort to continue attracting unsuspecting investors under a different name.

One of the key concerns raised is the existence of unique, allegedly fabricated digital coins available exclusively on SILEGX. The platform reportedly encourages investors to purchase these coins during an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) phase, promising high returns. The email suggests that these tactics are used to lure in more funds under the pretext of unlocking VIP investment statuses, a practice that has been linked to fraudulent schemes in the past.
Additionally, there are reports of withdrawal restrictions similar to those experienced by UKXVE users. Investors allegedly face demands for additional “processing fees” before being allowed to withdraw their funds. However, even after paying these fees, many users reportedly still fail to retrieve their money.

Malaysias Securities Commission (SC) has already added SILEGX to its Investor Alert List, warning the public against dealing with the entity. The list includes unlicensed platforms suspected of engaging in unauthorized investment activities.
Further adding to the credibility of these allegations, media reports indicate that police reports have been filed by victims who claim to have lost their money through such schemes. According to Malaysia Gazette, individuals, including retired professionals, have fallen victim to these investment scams. Similarly, Bernama has reported on ongoing legal cases linked to fraudulent online trading platforms.
If the allegations are accurate, SILEGX could be part of a larger pattern where scam brokers shut down under regulatory pressure only to reappear under new names. The email suggests that DIGZAX, another platform with similar complaints, may also be linked to this network of fraudulent brokers.
For now, it remains crucial for investors to exercise caution and conduct thorough research before engaging with online trading platforms. Regulatory bodies continue to monitor the situation, but public awareness remains the first line of defense against potential scams.
While concrete legal action against SILEGX remains uncertain, the similarities between its operations and previously exposed scams raise serious concerns. The presence of its name on the SCs Investor Alert List, coupled with growing reports from affected investors, warrants closer scrutiny from regulators and law enforcement agencies.
As investigations continue, potential investors are advised to remain vigilant and avoid dealing with unregulated platforms that promise unrealistic returns. If you or someone you know has been affected, consider reporting the matter to authorities to help prevent further losses within the community.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Reference to WikiFX records shows that **ExpertOption is a high-risk broker.** While the company has been operating since 2017 and has a popular trading app, the safety foundations are weak.

If you are looking into ICM Capital (also known simply as ICM), you might be attracted by their established history since 2017 or their access to the MetaTrader platforms. However, glancing at the surface isn't enough when your capital is at risk. With a concerning WikiFX Score of 2.46 out of 10, this broker is currently flashing warning signals that every potential client needs to understand before hitting the "Deposit" button.

In the world of online trading, trust is the currency that matters most. However, recent data aggregation by WikiFX has signaled a "level red" alert regarding Tradeview Markets. Between July and November 2025, our support center was flooded with complaints alleging that the broker unilaterally wiped out account balances under the guise of "negative balance reversal," while simultaneously employing "account deletion" tactics in Asian markets. This report investigates the alarming patterns behind these complaints and analyzes why existing regulations failed to protect these traders.

For traders asking, "Is ZarVista legit?", the evidence points to a clear and strong conclusion: ZarVista operates as a high-risk broker. While it shows a modern interface and different account types, these features are overshadowed by major weaknesses in how it is regulated, a history of legal problems, and many user complaints. This article will break down these issues to give you a complete view of the risks involved. Our analysis shows that the chance of losing capital when dealing with ZarVista is very high. The combination of weak overseas licensing and documented problems creates a situation where trader funds are not properly protected.