WikiFX Deep Dive Review: ExpertOption
Reference to WikiFX records shows that **ExpertOption is a high-risk broker.** While the company has been operating since 2017 and has a popular trading app, the safety foundations are weak.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:CFTC fines EmpiresX founders $130M for fraud, imposes permanent trading ban.

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced that a U.S. federal court has ordered more than $130 million in penalties and restitution against the Brazilian founders of EmpiresX, an unauthorized cryptocurrency investment platform. The court ruling includes financial penalties and permanent trading bans.
Court documents indicate that Empires Consulting operated an investment scheme under the name EmpiresX, claiming to offer high and consistent returns. The platform was advertised as using an algorithm-driven trading system to generate profits. However, the promised returns were not delivered.
Instead of investing the funds, founders Emerson Pires and Flavio Goncalves misused at least $40 million obtained from investors. The funds were used to purchase Bitcoin (BTC), Ether (ETH), and Tether (USDT). Withdrawals were restricted, and investors were shown fabricated account statements displaying non-existent profits.
Investigations further show that part of the funds was used for personal expenditures, including luxury purchases and travel. Authorities recovered approximately $22.8 million in digital assets.
The court ruled that the EmpiresX founders committed multiple violations, including fraudulent misrepresentation, failure to register with the CFTC, and misappropriation of investor funds. On February 4, Judge Cecilia Altonaga of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida issued a ruling imposing financial penalties and permanent injunctions against the defendants.

The documents also state that an associate of the scheme, Joshua Nicholas, was arrested and pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit securities fraud in September 2022. Pires and Goncalves left for Brazil after learning of the CFTC charges. In July 2022, the U.S. Department of Justice designated them as fugitives, but Brazilian law prevents their extradition to the United States.
The court ordered the defendants to jointly pay $32.1 million in disgorgement and $96.5 million in civil monetary penalties. Nicholas was also fined $289,000 in disgorgement and an additional $867,000 in civil penalties. In addition, the ruling permanently prohibits defendants from participating in any trading activities in the U.S. financial markets.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Reference to WikiFX records shows that **ExpertOption is a high-risk broker.** While the company has been operating since 2017 and has a popular trading app, the safety foundations are weak.

If you are looking into ICM Capital (also known simply as ICM), you might be attracted by their established history since 2017 or their access to the MetaTrader platforms. However, glancing at the surface isn't enough when your capital is at risk. With a concerning WikiFX Score of 2.46 out of 10, this broker is currently flashing warning signals that every potential client needs to understand before hitting the "Deposit" button.

In the world of online trading, trust is the currency that matters most. However, recent data aggregation by WikiFX has signaled a "level red" alert regarding Tradeview Markets. Between July and November 2025, our support center was flooded with complaints alleging that the broker unilaterally wiped out account balances under the guise of "negative balance reversal," while simultaneously employing "account deletion" tactics in Asian markets. This report investigates the alarming patterns behind these complaints and analyzes why existing regulations failed to protect these traders.

For traders asking, "Is ZarVista legit?", the evidence points to a clear and strong conclusion: ZarVista operates as a high-risk broker. While it shows a modern interface and different account types, these features are overshadowed by major weaknesses in how it is regulated, a history of legal problems, and many user complaints. This article will break down these issues to give you a complete view of the risks involved. Our analysis shows that the chance of losing capital when dealing with ZarVista is very high. The combination of weak overseas licensing and documented problems creates a situation where trader funds are not properly protected.