WikiFX Deep Dive Review: ExpertOption
Reference to WikiFX records shows that **ExpertOption is a high-risk broker.** While the company has been operating since 2017 and has a popular trading app, the safety foundations are weak.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract: A 77-year-old company director lost RM2.1 million after becoming a victim of a fraudulent investment scheme on cryptocurrency exchange platform. The incident occurred after he came across an advertisement on Facebook promoting a cryptocurrency investment opportunity in August.

A 77-year-old company director lost RM2.1 million after becoming a victim of a fraudulent investment scheme on cryptocurrency exchange platform. The incident occurred after he came across an advertisement on Facebook promoting a cryptocurrency investment opportunity in August.
Selangor police chief Datuk Hussein Omar Khan reported that the victim initiated contact with the scammer through WhatsApp. He was instructed to register via a provided link to participate in the scheme. Believing in the promise of high returns, he proceeded to transfer RM2,118,810 across 26 transactions to 11 different bank accounts.
Despite completing the transactions, the expected profits never materialised. Instead, the fraudster demanded an additional RM1.2 million in taxes before the victim could withdraw his supposed earnings from the platform. Realising he had been deceived, the director filed a police report in Kajang. Authorities have classified the case under Section 420 of the Penal Code, which deals with fraud.

Datuk Hussein urged the public to exercise caution when encountering investment offers on social media. He highlighted the dangers of schemes that guarantee unrealistic returns and warned against using mobile applications that are not approved by Bank Negara Malaysia or the Securities Commission Malaysia.
Under no circumstances should you engage with an investment scheme advertised on social media that promises high returns or sounds too good to be true without exercising caution. If in doubt, download the free WikiFX mobile application from Google Play or the App Store.

This global broker regulatory query platform, at your fingertips, provides detailed information about brokers, including their regulatory status, customer reviews, and safety ratings. It allows users to verify the legitimacy of investment platforms before committing their money. With access to in-depth insights and risk alerts, WikiFX equips potential investors with the tools to make informed decisions and steer clear of unauthorised or unlicensed entities. By using WikiFX, users can safeguard their savings and avoid the costly traps of fraudulent investment syndicates.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Reference to WikiFX records shows that **ExpertOption is a high-risk broker.** While the company has been operating since 2017 and has a popular trading app, the safety foundations are weak.

If you are looking into ICM Capital (also known simply as ICM), you might be attracted by their established history since 2017 or their access to the MetaTrader platforms. However, glancing at the surface isn't enough when your capital is at risk. With a concerning WikiFX Score of 2.46 out of 10, this broker is currently flashing warning signals that every potential client needs to understand before hitting the "Deposit" button.

In the world of online trading, trust is the currency that matters most. However, recent data aggregation by WikiFX has signaled a "level red" alert regarding Tradeview Markets. Between July and November 2025, our support center was flooded with complaints alleging that the broker unilaterally wiped out account balances under the guise of "negative balance reversal," while simultaneously employing "account deletion" tactics in Asian markets. This report investigates the alarming patterns behind these complaints and analyzes why existing regulations failed to protect these traders.

For traders asking, "Is ZarVista legit?", the evidence points to a clear and strong conclusion: ZarVista operates as a high-risk broker. While it shows a modern interface and different account types, these features are overshadowed by major weaknesses in how it is regulated, a history of legal problems, and many user complaints. This article will break down these issues to give you a complete view of the risks involved. Our analysis shows that the chance of losing capital when dealing with ZarVista is very high. The combination of weak overseas licensing and documented problems creates a situation where trader funds are not properly protected.